XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L
XUEK.L (Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF) and HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - XUEK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while HMEF.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUEK.L returned 6.75%/yr vs 5.72%/yr for HMEF.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUEK.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HMEF.L.
Performance
XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUEK.L achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than HMEF.L's 25.52% return.
XUEK.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 15.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- —
HMEF.L
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 25.52%
- 6M
- 27.29%
- 1Y
- 51.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUEK.L Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF | 5.66% | 23.26% | 0.43% | 12.46% | -11.69% | 15.48% | 4.79% | 18.78% |
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 25.52% | 21.88% | 6.43% | -0.16% | -12.59% | -4.10% | 12.68% | 7.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUEK.L and HMEF.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XUEK.L and HMEF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Industrials
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Healthcare
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Technology
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Consumer Cyclical
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Consumer Defensive
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Utilities
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Basic Materials
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Energy
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Communication Services
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Real Estate
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L — Risk / Return Rank
XUEK.L
HMEF.L
XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUEK.L | HMEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.55 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 4.60 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 15.90 | -10.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUEK.L | HMEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 2.99 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.35 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.27 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUEK.L drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum HMEF.L drawdown of -32.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEK.L and HMEF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUEK.L | HMEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -32.91% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -11.07% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.04% | -15.40% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.76% | -26.99% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -2.56% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -12.28% | +6.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.21% | -0.07% |
Volatility
XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) is 3.83%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that XUEK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUEK.L | HMEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 7.42% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 14.61% | -4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 17.04% | -3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 16.23% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 17.92% | -1.55% |
XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUEK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HMEF.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUEK.L vs. HMEF.L - Dividend Comparison
XUEK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, which matches HMEF.L's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
XUEK.L Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUEK.L and HMEF.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUEK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUEK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for HMEF.L.
XUEK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while HMEF.L is Emerging Markets Equities. XUEK.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while HMEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUEK.L and 0.15% for HMEF.L.
Find the right allocation for XUEK.L and HMEF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer