PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L).

HMEF.L and EQQQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HMEF.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 5, 2011. EQQQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. Both HMEF.L and EQQQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMEF.L
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD		6.17%24.55%9.08%2.44%-10.01%-2.27%14.81%12.74%-9.63%25.68%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		-4.21%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%20.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMEF.L achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.L's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HMEF.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 8.82%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.58% annualized return.

HMEF.L

1D
3.24%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
6.17%
6M
10.21%
1Y
30.69%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
4.84%
10Y*
8.82%

EQQQ.L

1D
2.30%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
-4.21%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
19.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with HMEF.L:
HMEF.L vs. VFEG.LHMEF.L vs. AIAI.LHMEF.L vs. IEEM.LHMEF.L vs. VWRL.LHMEF.L vs. HMWO.LHMEF.L vs. SPX4.LHMEF.L vs. EMIM.L
Often compared with EQQQ.L:
EQQQ.L vs. QQQEQQQ.L vs. QQQMEQQQ.L vs. EQGB.LEQQQ.L vs. CNX1.LEQQQ.L vs. EQQU.LEQQQ.L vs. CSPX.LEQQQ.L vs. XNAQ.L

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMEF.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
HMEF.L
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD

Return for Risk

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HMEF.L
HMEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HMEF.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

1.09

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.37

1.62

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

1.87

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.08

5.60

+4.48

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMEF.L and EQQQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HMEF.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.09

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.72

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

1.01

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.86

-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between HMEF.L and EQQQ.L is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than EQQQ.L's 0.29% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMEF.L
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD		1.97%1.98%2.43%2.58%2.99%2.01%1.66%2.11%2.14%1.61%1.69%2.25%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.29%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%

Drawdowns

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMEF.L drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEF.L and EQQQ.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HMEF.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-33.75%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-10.97%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.78%

-27.76%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.33%

-27.76%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.68%

-8.20%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-5.64%

-4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.65%

-0.53%

Volatility

HMEF.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.86%. This indicates that HMEF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HMEF.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

4.86%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

11.45%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.71%

18.93%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

19.26%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

19.37%

-1.66%