HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L).

HMEF.L and EMIM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HMEF.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 5, 2011. EMIM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both HMEF.L and EMIM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	6.17%	24.55%	9.08%	2.44%	-10.01%	-2.27%	14.81%	12.74%	-9.63%	25.68%
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)	5.30%	23.35%	9.18%	4.93%	-10.17%	0.74%	14.91%	12.69%	-9.32%	24.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMEF.L achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than EMIM.L's 5.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HMEF.L having a 8.82% annualized return and EMIM.L not far ahead at 9.13%.

HMEF.L

• 1D: 3.24%
• 1M: -5.62%
• YTD: 6.17%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 30.69%
• 3Y*: 13.43%
• 5Y*: 4.84%
• 10Y*: 8.82%

EMIM.L

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: -5.63%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 9.33%
• 1Y: 29.91%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: 9.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMEF.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

EMIM.L

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)

HMEF.L

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD

Return for Risk

HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMEF.L

HMEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HMEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
HMEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HMEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HMEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

EMIM.L

EMIM.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EMIM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EMIM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EMIM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EMIM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMEF.L	EMIM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.82	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.34	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.35	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	2.78	+0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.08	9.93	+0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMEF.L and EMIM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMEF.L	EMIM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.82	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.36	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.52	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.41	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between HMEF.L and EMIM.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison

HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while EMIM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	1.97%	1.98%	2.43%	2.58%	2.99%	2.01%	1.66%	2.11%	2.14%	1.61%	1.69%	2.25%
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMEF.L drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, roughly equal to the maximum EMIM.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEF.L and EMIM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMEF.L	EMIM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.72%	-31.70%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.07%	-10.92%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.78%	-21.98%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.33%	-26.46%	-0.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.68%	-7.55%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.09%	-8.81%	-1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	3.05%	+0.07%

Volatility

HMEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) have volatilities of 7.28% and 6.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMEF.L	EMIM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.28%	6.95%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	12.52%	+0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.71%	16.39%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.80%	15.45%	+0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.71%	17.64%	+0.07%