XUDV vs. SCDL
XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) and SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - XUDV is a Dividend fund tracking the VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while SCDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XUDV returned 33.81% vs 62.63% for SCDL. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XUDV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SCDL.
Performance
XUDV vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUDV achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly lower than SCDL's 47.89% return.
XUDV
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- YTD
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.60%
SCDL
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- YTD
- 47.89%
- 1Y
- 62.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.83K | $30.61K | $22.30K | |
| $488.33K | $320.23K | $391.69K |
XUDV vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 25.74% | 8.52% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 47.89% | -2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUDV and SCDL is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XUDV and SCDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUDV vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank
XUDV
SCDL
XUDV vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XUDV | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.36 | 6.18 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.66 | 15.87 | +2.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XUDV vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum SCDL drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and SCDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUDV | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -34.87% | +18.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -10.19% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -2.03% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -11.67% | +9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.96% | -2.14% |
Volatility
XUDV vs. SCDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) is 3.32%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that XUDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUDV | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 7.76% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 15.48% | -6.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 21.75% | -9.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 29.02% | -13.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 28.75% | -12.77% |
XUDV vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUDV vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison
XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, while SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 3.32% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUDV and SCDL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCDL has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to XUDV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUDV dropped -15.98% vs SCDL's -34.87%.
On 1-year performance, SCDL leads with 62.63% vs 33.81% for XUDV. On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XUDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCDL has performed better with a 62.63% return vs 33.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.
XUDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.
XUDV is categorized as Dividend, while SCDL is Leveraged Equities. XUDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while SCDL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.95% for SCDL.
SCDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XUDV and SCDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer