XUDV vs. PID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUDV is a Dividend fund tracking the VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while PID is a Global Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XUDV returned 30.71% vs 14.07% for PID. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUDV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.

Performance

XUDV vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUDV achieves a 20.52% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 3.12% return.

XUDV

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 20.52%
• 6M: 19.58%
• 1Y: 30.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PID

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -2.75%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 6M: 3.17%
• 1Y: 14.07%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUDV vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF	20.52%	8.52%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.12%	22.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XUDV and PID is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	0.68

The correlation between XUDV and PID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUDV vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XUDV	PID
Financial Services	23.5%	17.5%
Consumer Defensive	15.0%	6.2%
Technology	13.5%	9.1%
Industrials	12.0%	7.5%
Healthcare	7.9%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	6.2%
Communication Services	7.0%	13.7%
Energy	6.3%	12.5%
Utilities	3.7%	15.1%
Basic Materials	1.3%	3.3%
Real Estate	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

XUDV vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUDV

XUDV Risk / Return Rank: 84
XUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
XUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

PID

PID Risk / Return Rank: 42
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUDV vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XUDV	PID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	1.44	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	2.13	+1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.26	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.87	1.89	+2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.36	6.22	+10.14

XUDV vs. PID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the PID Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUDV and PID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XUDV vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and PID.

Drawdown Indicators

	XUDV	PID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.98%	-66.34%	+50.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.34%	-7.47%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	-4.35%	+2.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-13.01%	+10.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	2.27%	-0.39%

Volatility

XUDV vs. PID - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.68%. This indicates that XUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XUDV	PID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	2.68%	+1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	7.86%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	9.83%	+2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.31%	13.96%	+2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.31%	17.67%	-1.36%

XUDV vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

XUDV vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than PID's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.61%	3.28%	3.88%	3.31%	3.30%	3.30%	3.16%	3.99%	3.87%	3.46%	3.90%	4.48%
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF	2.58%	3.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XUDV and PID in my portfolio?

XUDV and PID have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XUDV or PID?

XUDV has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to PID (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUDV dropped -15.98% vs PID's -66.34%.

Which ETF is better, XUDV or PID?

On 1-year performance, XUDV leads with 30.71% vs 14.07% for PID. On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XUDV or PID?

Over the 1-year period, XUDV has performed better with a 30.71% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XUDV or PID?

XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XUDV or PID?

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.58% for XUDV.

What is the main difference between XUDV and PID?

XUDV is categorized as Dividend, while PID is Global Equities. XUDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.56% for PID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.