PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTWO vs. XEMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XTWO vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XTWO vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTWO
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.27%5.17%3.92%4.27%0.17%
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
-0.24%13.98%8.77%10.26%1.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTWO achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than XEMD's -0.24% return.


XTWO

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
0.27%
6M
1.41%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
10Y*

XEMD

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
3.46%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
10.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XTWO vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTWO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XTWO vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTWO
XTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XEMD
XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTWO vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTWOXEMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

1.88

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.86

2.65

+1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.40

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

3.17

+1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.27

13.31

+1.96

XTWO vs. XEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the XEMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTWO and XEMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTWOXEMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.88

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

1.32

+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between XTWO and XEMD is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XTWO vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison

XTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than XEMD's 6.06% yield.


Drawdowns

XTWO vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTWO drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, smaller than the maximum XEMD drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWO and XEMD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XTWOXEMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-10.01%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.91%

-3.52%

+2.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-2.46%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-1.29%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.84%

-0.59%

Volatility

XTWO vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) is 0.56%, while BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) has a volatility of 2.45%. This indicates that XTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XTWOXEMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

2.45%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.90%

3.39%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56%

5.81%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.20%

6.94%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.20%

6.94%

-4.74%