PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTWO vs. RPIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTWO vs. RPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTWO achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than RPIFX's 0.83% return.


XTWO

1D
0.05%
1M
0.07%
6M
0.62%
YTD
0.74%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.66%

RPIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
6M
0.78%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
6.47%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
4.66%
ALL TIME*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$4.33M$4.70M$2.37M

XTWO vs. RPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTWO
BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.74%5.17%3.92%4.27%0.14%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
0.83%6.71%8.47%10.13%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XTWO and RPIFX is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTWO vs. RPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XTWO
XTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIFX
RPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XTWO vs. RPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTWORPIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.51

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.49

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

8.13

+1.28

XTWO vs. RPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the RPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTWO and RPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTWO vs. RPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTWO drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, smaller than the maximum RPIFX drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWO and RPIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTWORPIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-25.10%

+23.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.91%

-1.44%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.18%

-2.28%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.39%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-1.33%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

0.44%

-0.17%

Volatility

XTWO vs. RPIFX - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) has a higher volatility of 0.34% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) at 0.31%. This indicates that XTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTWORPIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

0.31%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.27%

1.69%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46%

2.25%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.17%

2.76%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.17%

3.79%

-1.62%

XTWO vs. RPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTWO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RPIFX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTWO vs. RPIFX - Dividend Comparison

XTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than RPIFX's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
5.80%7.22%7.77%6.53%4.12%3.94%4.29%5.12%5.16%4.32%4.31%4.45%
XTWO
BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.97%4.24%4.54%4.07%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTWO and RPIFX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTWO has higher volatility (0.34%) compared to RPIFX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTWO dropped -1.73% vs RPIFX's -25.10%.

XTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTWO and RPIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer