XTR vs. SPYV
XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTR is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTR returned 18.55%/yr vs 15.72%/yr for SPYV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XTR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
XTR vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return.
XTR
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
XTR vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 8.67% | 13.66% | 21.85% | 21.16% | -17.67% | 4.43% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTR and SPYV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XTR and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTR vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTR
SPYV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XTR
SPYV
Financial Services
XTR
SPYV
Communication Services
XTR
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
XTR
SPYV
Healthcare
XTR
SPYV
Industrials
XTR
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
XTR
SPYV
Energy
XTR
SPYV
Utilities
XTR
SPYV
Real Estate
XTR
SPYV
Basic Materials
XTR
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTR vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
XTR
SPYV
XTR vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTR | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.43 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 13.16 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTR | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.17 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.42 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
XTR vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTR | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -58.45% | +37.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -6.22% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -17.54% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.57% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -8.72% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.62% | +0.37% |
Volatility
XTR vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that XTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTR | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 1.98% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 7.04% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.76% | 9.84% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 14.40% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 16.94% | -3.16% |
XTR vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XTR vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.40%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 16.40% | 17.82% | 20.89% | 1.09% | 1.08% | 2.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTR and SPYV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTR has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTR dropped -20.83% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 3-year performance, XTR leads with 18.55% vs 15.72% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XTR has performed better with a 18.55% return vs 15.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XTR.
XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.
XTR is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SPYV is S&P 500. XTR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XTR and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTR and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer