PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTR vs. XCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XTR vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XTR vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
-5.02%13.66%21.85%21.16%-17.67%4.43%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.35%10.25%20.67%15.64%-12.93%3.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a -5.02% return, which is significantly higher than XCLR's -5.35% return.


XTR

1D
1.99%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
-5.02%
6M
-3.26%
1Y
13.41%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
10Y*

XCLR

1D
1.50%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-3.90%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XTR vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XTR and XCLR have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XTR vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTR
XTR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTRXCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.96

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.39

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.27

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.36

5.31

+1.04

XTR vs. XCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the XCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTR and XCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTRXCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.96

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.58

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between XTR and XCLR is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XTR vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.76%, more than XCLR's 13.90% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
18.76%17.82%20.89%1.09%1.08%2.32%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
13.90%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%

Drawdowns

XTR vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than XCLR's maximum drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and XCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XTRXCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-14.63%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-8.29%

-0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.69%

-6.91%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

-4.82%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.98%

+0.21%

Volatility

XTR vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) at 3.39%. This indicates that XTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XTRXCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.39%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

7.15%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

10.52%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

10.58%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.87%

10.58%

+3.29%