XTR vs. SPYH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) and SPYH (NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. XTR is passively managed, while SPYH is actively managed. Over the past year, XTR returned 22.85% vs 18.78% for SPYH. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XTR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SPYH.

Performance

XTR vs. SPYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than SPYH's 5.74% return.

XTR

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 5.03%
• YTD: 8.67%
• 6M: 8.51%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 18.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPYH

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 5.74%
• 6M: 6.16%
• 1Y: 18.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTR vs. SPYH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	8.67%	22.83%
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF	5.74%	21.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XTR and SPYH is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.97

The correlation between XTR and SPYH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XTR vs. SPYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTR	SPYH
Technology	35.6%	35.5%
Financial Services	11.8%	12.0%
Communication Services	11.2%	11.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.9%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.4%
Industrials	8.3%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.1%
Energy	3.5%	3.6%
Utilities	2.4%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.7%

Return for Risk

XTR vs. SPYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTR

XTR Risk / Return Rank: 61
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SPYH

SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR vs. SPYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTR	SPYH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.42	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.35	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.46	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	3.13	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.51	15.14	-3.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTR vs. SPYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SPYH Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTR and SPYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTR	SPYH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	2.42	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	1.93	-1.21

Drawdowns

XTR vs. SPYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than SPYH's maximum drawdown of -6.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and SPYH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTR	SPYH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.83%	-6.39%	-14.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-6.02%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-0.39%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.95%	-0.71%	-5.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.24%	+0.75%

Volatility

XTR vs. SPYH - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) at 1.55%. This indicates that XTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTR	SPYH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	1.55%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	5.78%	+2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.76%	7.80%	+2.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.78%	12.36%	+1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.78%	12.36%	+1.42%

XTR vs. SPYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYH's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTR vs. SPYH - Dividend Comparison

XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.40%, more than SPYH's 7.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF	7.54%	5.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	16.40%	17.82%	20.89%	1.09%	1.08%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTR and SPYH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, XTR and SPYH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XTR or SPYH?

XTR has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to SPYH (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTR dropped -20.83% vs SPYH's -6.39%.

Which ETF is better, XTR or SPYH?

On 1-year performance, XTR leads with 22.85% vs 18.78% for SPYH. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTR or SPYH?

Over the 1-year period, XTR has performed better with a 22.85% return vs 18.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTR or SPYH?

XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTR or SPYH?

XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 7.54% for SPYH.

What is the main difference between XTR and SPYH?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XTR and 0.68% for SPYH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.