XTL vs. IDV
XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XTL returned 16.10%/yr vs 10.65%/yr for IDV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.
Performance
XTL vs. IDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 51.46% return, which is significantly higher than IDV's 12.82% return. Over the past 10 years, XTL has outperformed IDV with an annualized return of 16.10%, while IDV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.
XTL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 55.42%
- 1Y
- 120.69%
- 3Y*
- 45.66%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
IDV
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 6M
- 14.44%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
XTL vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 51.46% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 12.82% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTL and IDV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XTL and IDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XTL vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTL
IDV
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XTL
IDV
Communication Services
XTL
IDV
Real Estate
XTL
IDV
Basic Materials
XTL
-
IDV
Consumer Cyclical
XTL
-
IDV
Consumer Defensive
XTL
-
IDV
Energy
XTL
-
IDV
Financial Services
XTL
-
IDV
Healthcare
XTL
-
IDV
-
Industrials
XTL
-
IDV
Utilities
XTL
-
IDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTL vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank
XTL
IDV
XTL vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTL | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.50 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.26 | 4.18 | +4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.62 | 15.48 | +19.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTL vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and IDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTL | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.01% | -70.14% | +33.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -8.52% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -11.86% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.01% | -29.19% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.01% | -42.50% | +5.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.61% | -2.37% | -4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -15.38% | +5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 2.30% | +1.20% |
Volatility
XTL vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) at 4.28%. This indicates that XTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTL | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 4.28% | +6.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.21% | 10.90% | +13.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.10% | 13.07% | +17.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.35% | 15.59% | +9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 17.93% | +5.74% |
XTL vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTL vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison
XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than IDV's 7.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 7.09% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTL and IDV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTL has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to IDV (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs IDV's -70.14%.
On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 16.10% vs 10.65% for IDV. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 16.10% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 0.86% for XTL.
XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while IDV is Global Equities. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.49% for IDV.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTL and IDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer