PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTJL vs. XXXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTJL vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly lower than XXXX's 17.43% return.


XTJL

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.66%
YTD
5.24%
6M
6.12%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
10Y*

XXXX

1D
-10.56%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
17.43%
6M
13.64%
1Y
73.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTJL vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
5.24%15.42%14.43%3.11%
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
17.43%17.36%61.36%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and XXXX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023

0.92

The correlation between XTJL and XXXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTJL vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XXXX
XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTJL vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTJLXXXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.27

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.99

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.36

7.60

+9.75

XTJL vs. XXXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the XXXX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and XXXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTJLXXXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.55

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.76

-0.12

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, smaller than the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and XXXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTJLXXXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-62.27%

+39.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

-37.25%

+32.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-11.80%

+11.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-11.59%

+7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

9.75%

-8.85%

Volatility

XTJL vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is 0.31%, while MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a volatility of 15.37%. This indicates that XTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTJLXXXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

15.37%

-15.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

37.19%

-31.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

48.04%

-40.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

61.05%

-45.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

61.05%

-45.84%

XTJL vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTJL vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTJL nor XXXX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XTJL and XXXX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XXXX has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to XTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs XXXX's -62.27%.

On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 73.91% vs 15.63% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 73.91% return vs 15.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

XTJL and XXXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 2.95% for XXXX.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTJL and XXXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer