XTEN vs. XEMD
XTEN (BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTEN is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 10 Year Target Duration Index, while XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTEN returned 1.73%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for XEMD. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTEN charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XEMD.
Performance
XTEN vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTEN achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's 2.75% return.
XTEN
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEMD
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 11.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTEN vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTEN BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | -0.54% | 7.37% | -2.15% | 4.00% | -2.94% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 2.75% | 13.98% | 8.77% | 10.26% | 1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTEN and XEMD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XTEN and XEMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTEN vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank
XTEN
XEMD
XTEN vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTEN | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.51 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 3.39 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | 15.27 | -12.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTEN | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 2.57 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.39 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
XTEN vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.86%, which is greater than XEMD's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTEN and XEMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTEN | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -10.01% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -3.52% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.15% | -4.31% | -6.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -0.37% | -3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -1.26% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 0.78% | +1.08% |
Volatility
XTEN vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) at 1.43%. This indicates that XTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTEN | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 1.43% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.41% | 3.70% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.41% | 4.66% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 6.88% | +2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 6.88% | +2.68% |
XTEN vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTEN has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTEN vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison
XTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than XEMD's 5.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.82% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% |
XTEN BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.40% | 4.05% | 4.21% | 3.71% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTEN and XEMD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTEN has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to XEMD (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTEN dropped -13.86% vs XEMD's -10.01%.
On 3-year performance, XEMD leads with 11.23% vs 1.73% for XTEN. On fees, XTEN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, XEMD has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XEMD has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 1.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTEN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XEMD.
XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 4.40% for XTEN.
XTEN is categorized as Government Bonds, while XEMD is Emerging Markets Bonds. XTEN tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 10 Year Target Duration Index, while XEMD tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XTEN and 0.29% for XEMD.
XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTEN and XEMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer