PortfoliosLab logo
XTEN vs. FBND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XTEN and FBND is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

XTEN vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XTEN:

0.54

FBND:

1.19

Sortino Ratio

XTEN:

0.80

FBND:

1.72

Omega Ratio

XTEN:

1.09

FBND:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

XTEN:

0.50

FBND:

0.70

Martin Ratio

XTEN:

1.02

FBND:

3.35

Ulcer Index

XTEN:

4.58%

FBND:

1.92%

Daily Std Dev

XTEN:

8.85%

FBND:

5.39%

Max Drawdown

XTEN:

-13.80%

FBND:

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

XTEN:

-5.20%

FBND:

-3.00%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XTEN having a 2.56% return and FBND slightly higher at 2.68%.


XTEN

YTD

2.56%

1M

-1.91%

6M

-1.00%

1Y

4.77%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FBND

YTD

2.68%

1M

-0.45%

6M

0.89%

1Y

6.37%

3Y*

2.51%

5Y*

0.38%

10Y*

2.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XTEN vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTEN has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XTEN vs. FBND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XTEN is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XTEN is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XTEN is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XTEN is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XTEN is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XTEN is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBND is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBND is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBND is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBND is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBND is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBND is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XTEN vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTEN and FBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

XTEN vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

XTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than FBND's 4.65% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XTEN
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.15%4.20%3.71%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.65%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%0.66%

Drawdowns

XTEN vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.80%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTEN and FBND.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

XTEN vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.50%. This indicates that XTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...