PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTEN vs. XCCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XTEN vs. XCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XTEN vs. XCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTEN
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.11%7.37%-2.15%4.00%-2.94%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
-2.95%7.25%13.01%20.57%-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTEN achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than XCCC's -2.95% return.


XTEN

1D
0.17%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.41%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
1.32%
5Y*
10Y*

XCCC

1D
1.20%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-2.98%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XTEN vs. XCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTEN has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XCCC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XTEN vs. XCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTEN
XTEN Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

XCCC
XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTEN vs. XCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTENXCCCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

0.63

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

0.90

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.16

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

0.70

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.45

3.09

-1.64

XTEN vs. XCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the XCCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTEN and XCCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTENXCCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

0.63

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.90

-0.73

Correlation

The correlation between XTEN and XCCC is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XTEN vs. XCCC - Dividend Comparison

XTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than XCCC's 10.23% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
XTEN
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.22%4.05%4.21%3.71%1.04%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
10.23%10.06%10.68%12.05%7.63%

Drawdowns

XTEN vs. XCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.86%, which is greater than XCCC's maximum drawdown of -10.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTEN and XCCC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XTENXCCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-10.99%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.27%

-8.25%

+2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-3.93%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-1.95%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.87%

+0.29%

Volatility

XTEN vs. XCCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) is 2.54%, while BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that XTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XTENXCCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.84%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

4.10%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.15%

9.63%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.70%

8.95%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.70%

8.95%

+0.75%