XT vs. IGV
XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from iShares - XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net) while IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XT returned 14.88%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for IGV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XT charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
XT vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -17.37% return. Over the past 10 years, XT has underperformed IGV with an annualized return of 14.88%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
XT
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 37.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.88%
IGV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -17.37%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
XT vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 15.73% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 30.74% | -4.93% | 33.71% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -17.37% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XT and IGV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XT and IGV has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XT vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XT
IGV
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
XT
IGV
Healthcare
XT
IGV
-
Industrials
XT
IGV
Consumer Cyclical
XT
IGV
Utilities
XT
IGV
-
Communication Services
XT
IGV
Financial Services
XT
IGV
Basic Materials
XT
IGV
-
Energy
XT
IGV
-
Real Estate
XT
IGV
-
Consumer Defensive
XT
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XT vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
XT
IGV
XT vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XT | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.91 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | -0.49 | +4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.43 | -1.00 | +15.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XT vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XT | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.41% | -63.45% | +29.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -36.61% | +26.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.09% | -36.61% | +14.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | -45.85% | +11.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.41% | -45.85% | +11.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -25.85% | +21.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -14.46% | +7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 17.94% | -15.32% |
Volatility
XT vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is 8.14%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that XT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XT | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 12.71% | -4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 24.86% | -11.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 28.27% | -10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 27.97% | -6.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 26.38% | -6.26% |
XT vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XT vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, more than IGV's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.08% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XT and IGV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.71%) compared to XT (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.70% vs 14.88% for XT. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 14.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.39% for IGV.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XT and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer