XSW vs. XLV
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 13.25%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for XLV. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
XSW vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 13.25%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.92% annualized return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- 6M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- -3.96%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
XLV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 21.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
XSW vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -4.56% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.16% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and XLV is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XSW and XLV has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XSW vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
XLV
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSW
XLV
-
Financial Services
XSW
XLV
-
Communication Services
XSW
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
XLV
-
Healthcare
XSW
XLV
Industrials
XSW
XLV
-
Basic Materials
XSW
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
XLV
-
Energy
XSW
-
XLV
-
Real Estate
XSW
-
XLV
-
Utilities
XSW
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
XLV
XSW vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.24 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 2.06 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 4.88 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -39.17% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -10.47% | -23.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -17.11% | -16.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -17.11% | -28.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | -28.40% | -16.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.97% | -1.84% | -11.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -7.11% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.67% | 4.41% | +12.26% |
Volatility
XSW vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.76%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 5.76% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.53% | 11.53% | +13.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.16% | 15.75% | +13.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.04% | 14.93% | +14.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.29% | 16.61% | +9.68% |
XSW vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.57% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and XLV have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSW has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to XLV (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XSW leads with 13.25% vs 9.92% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSW has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.08% for XLV.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer