XSW vs. PSI
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 12.80%/yr vs 35.27%/yr for PSI. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
XSW vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 116.16% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed PSI with an annualized return of 12.80%, while PSI has yielded a comparatively higher 35.27% annualized return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -10.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
PSI
- 1D
- -7.60%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 116.16%
- 6M
- 110.97%
- 1Y
- 200.81%
- 3Y*
- 58.76%
- 5Y*
- 32.86%
- 10Y*
- 35.27%
XSW vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -13.68% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 116.16% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and PSI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XSW and PSI has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XSW vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
PSI
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSW
PSI
Financial Services
XSW
PSI
-
Communication Services
XSW
PSI
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
PSI
-
Healthcare
XSW
PSI
-
Industrials
XSW
PSI
Basic Materials
XSW
-
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
PSI
-
Energy
XSW
-
PSI
-
Real Estate
XSW
-
PSI
-
Utilities
XSW
-
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
PSI
XSW vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.61 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 13.06 | -13.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 45.36 | -46.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -62.96% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -15.48% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -41.07% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -44.85% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | -44.85% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.30% | -7.60% | -13.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -15.90% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 4.45% | +11.86% |
Volatility
XSW vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is 11.42%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 21.88%. This indicates that XSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 21.88% | -10.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.81% | 35.15% | -11.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 42.19% | -13.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 38.84% | -9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 35.61% | -9.35% |
XSW vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.03% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and PSI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (21.88%) compared to XSW (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs PSI's -62.96%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 35.27% vs 12.80% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 11.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 35.27% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.
PSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.56% for PSI.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.79 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer