XSW vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSW returned 8.06%/yr vs -1.05%/yr for KROP. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

XSW vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 11.60% return.

XSW

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: -13.68%
• 6M: -15.49%
• 1Y: -10.86%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: -1.20%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

KROP

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 7.63%
• 3Y*: -1.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSW vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF	-13.68%	-0.90%	25.81%	38.60%	-34.22%	-2.28%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	11.60%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XSW and KROP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between XSW and KROP has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XSW vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XSW	KROP
Technology	85.9%	-
Financial Services	9.0%	-
Communication Services	2.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	0.3%
Healthcare	0.8%	0.3%
Industrials	0.6%	40.4%
Basic Materials	-	32.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	27.1%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XSW vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSW

XSW Risk / Return Rank: 6
XSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 16
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSW vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSW	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	0.47	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	0.79	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.10	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	0.68	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	1.46	-2.13

XSW vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSW and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XSW vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSW	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.38%	-62.08%	+16.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.75%	-11.29%	-22.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.75%	-28.70%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.30%	-51.27%	+29.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.86%	-44.71%	+34.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.31%	5.23%	+11.08%

Volatility

XSW vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.54%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSW	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.42%	4.54%	+6.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.81%	12.48%	+11.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.83%	16.19%	+12.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.89%	22.23%	+6.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.26%	22.23%	+4.03%

XSW vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSW vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.45%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF	0.00%	0.06%	0.07%	0.20%	0.09%	0.13%	0.26%	0.12%	0.31%	0.46%	0.87%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSW and KROP in my portfolio?

XSW and KROP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSW or KROP?

XSW has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to KROP (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs KROP's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, XSW or KROP?

On 3-year performance, XSW leads with 8.06% vs -1.05% for KROP. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSW or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, XSW has performed better with a 8.06% return vs -1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSW or KROP?

XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSW or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.

What is the main difference between XSW and KROP?

XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.