XSW vs. KROP
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSW returned 1.40%/yr vs -11.94%/yr for KROP. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.
Performance
XSW vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 15.26% return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- 0.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.98%
KROP
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- 11.47%
- 3Y*
- -0.82%
- 5Y*
- -11.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $47.93K | $48.91K | $92.86K | |
| $8.95M | $8.27M | $10.07M |
XSW vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -2.35% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | -2.28% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 15.26% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and KROP is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XSW and KROP has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XSW vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
KROP
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSW
KROP
-
Financial Services
XSW
KROP
-
Communication Services
XSW
KROP
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
KROP
Healthcare
XSW
KROP
Industrials
XSW
KROP
Basic Materials
XSW
-
KROP
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
KROP
Energy
XSW
-
KROP
-
Real Estate
XSW
-
KROP
-
Utilities
XSW
-
KROP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
KROP
XSW vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.12 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 1.08 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 2.25 | -2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and KROP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -62.08% | +16.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -9.67% | -24.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -25.19% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -61.96% | +16.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.96% | -49.67% | +38.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -44.80% | +34.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.92% | 4.62% | +12.30% |
Volatility
XSW vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.81%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 4.81% | +3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.75% | 12.77% | +11.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.79% | 16.50% | +13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.15% | 22.13% | +7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 22.12% | +4.24% |
XSW vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.14% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and KROP have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSW has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to KROP (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs KROP's -62.08%.
On 5-year performance, XSW leads with 1.40% vs -11.94% for KROP. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XSW has performed better with a 1.40% return vs -11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.50% for KROP.
KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and KROP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer