XSW vs. IJR
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 12.80%/yr vs 11.30%/yr for IJR. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.
Performance
XSW vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 19.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has outperformed IJR with an annualized return of 12.80%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.30% annualized return.
XSW
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -10.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
IJR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 19.34%
- 6M
- 16.86%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
XSW vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -13.68% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 19.34% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and IJR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.71 |
The correlation between XSW and IJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSW vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
IJR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSW
IJR
Financial Services
XSW
IJR
Communication Services
XSW
IJR
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
IJR
Healthcare
XSW
IJR
Industrials
XSW
IJR
Basic Materials
XSW
-
IJR
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
IJR
Energy
XSW
-
IJR
Real Estate
XSW
-
IJR
Utilities
XSW
-
IJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
IJR
XSW vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSW | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.34 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.99 | -4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 13.39 | -14.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSW vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and IJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -58.15% | +12.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -8.68% | -25.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -28.02% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -28.02% | -17.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | -44.36% | -1.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.30% | -0.43% | -20.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -9.26% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 2.58% | +13.73% |
Volatility
XSW vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 4.96%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 4.96% | +6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.81% | 12.06% | +11.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.83% | 17.73% | +11.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 21.40% | +7.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 22.90% | +3.36% |
XSW vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.15% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and IJR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSW has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to IJR (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs IJR's -58.15%.
On 10-year performance, XSW leads with 12.80% vs 11.30% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSW has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.
IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.06% for IJR.
IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and IJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer