XSW vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XSW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSW returned -1.20%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

XSW vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -4.72% return.

XSW

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: -13.68%
• 6M: -15.49%
• 1Y: -10.86%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: -1.20%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

GLDM

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -8.82%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: -8.62%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 28.79%
• 5Y*: 18.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSW vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF	-13.68%	-0.90%	25.81%	38.60%	-34.22%	7.47%	52.41%	36.50%	-7.73%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-4.72%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XSW and GLDM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018	0.08

Return for Risk

XSW vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSW

XSW Risk / Return Rank: 6
XSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 22
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSW vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSW	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	0.80	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	1.15	-1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.17	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	0.89	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	2.40	-3.07

XSW vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSW and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XSW vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSW	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.38%	-24.35%	-21.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.75%	-24.35%	-9.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.75%	-24.35%	-9.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.38%	-24.35%	-21.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.30%	-23.82%	+2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.86%	-6.32%	-3.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.31%	9.05%	+7.26%

Volatility

XSW vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 8.16%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSW	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.42%	8.16%	+3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.81%	24.22%	-0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.83%	27.36%	+1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.89%	18.15%	+10.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.26%	17.02%	+9.24%

XSW vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSW vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSW nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF	0.00%	0.06%	0.07%	0.20%	0.09%	0.13%	0.26%	0.12%	0.31%	0.46%	0.87%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSW and GLDM in my portfolio?

XSW and GLDM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSW or GLDM?

XSW has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to GLDM (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

Which ETF is better, XSW or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.18% vs -1.20% for XSW. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 8.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSW or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.18% return vs -1.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSW or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSW or GLDM?

XSW and GLDM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XSW and GLDM?

XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while GLDM is Gold. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.