PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSW vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSW vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 23.56% return. Over the past 10 years, XSW has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 12.80%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.28% annualized return.


XSW

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
-13.68%
6M
-15.49%
1Y
-10.86%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
-1.20%
10Y*
12.80%

FTEC

1D
-3.70%
1M
0.35%
YTD
23.56%
6M
21.69%
1Y
47.58%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
25.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSW vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
-13.68%-0.90%25.81%38.60%-34.22%7.47%52.41%36.50%7.67%27.94%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
23.56%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XSW and FTEC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.79

The correlation between XSW and FTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSW vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSW
FTEC

Technology

85.9%
98.3%

Financial Services

9.0%
0.6%

Communication Services

2.7%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
0.0%

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.6%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XSW
85.9%
FTEC
98.3%

Financial Services

XSW
9.0%
FTEC
0.6%

Communication Services

XSW
2.7%
FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XSW
1.1%
FTEC
0.0%

Healthcare

XSW
0.8%
FTEC

-

Industrials

XSW
0.6%
FTEC
0.6%

Basic Materials

XSW

-

FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

XSW

-

FTEC

-

Energy

XSW

-

FTEC
0.3%

Real Estate

XSW

-

FTEC

-

Utilities

XSW

-

FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSW vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSW
XSW Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
XSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSW Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSW vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSWFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.35

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

2.94

-3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

9.03

-9.69

XSW vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSW and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSW vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSWFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.38%

-34.95%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.75%

-16.26%

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.75%

-27.30%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

-34.95%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.38%

-34.95%

-10.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.30%

-7.72%

-13.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-5.57%

-4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.31%

5.28%

+11.03%

Volatility

XSW vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) have volatilities of 11.42% and 11.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSWFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.42%

11.42%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.81%

18.65%

+5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.83%

22.79%

+6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.89%

25.60%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.26%

24.86%

+1.40%

XSW vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSW vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
XSW
SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
0.00%0.06%0.07%0.20%0.09%0.13%0.26%0.12%0.31%0.46%0.87%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSW and FTEC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to XSW (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.28% vs 12.80% for XSW. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.28% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.

FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.

XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSW and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer