XSW vs. BWET
XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSW returned 11.02%/yr vs 129.64%/yr for BWET. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
XSW vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.
XSW
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -7.49%
- 1Y
- -4.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
BWET
- 1D
- 4.26%
- 1M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 875.88%
- 6M
- 735.56%
- 1Y
- 1,800.91%
- 3Y*
- 129.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSW vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -6.38% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 33.21% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 875.88% | 96.22% | -39.21% | 15.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSW and BWET is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023 | -0.04 |
The correlation between XSW and BWET shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSW vs. BWET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSW
BWET
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSW
BWET
-
Financial Services
XSW
BWET
Communication Services
XSW
BWET
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSW
BWET
-
Industrials
XSW
BWET
-
Healthcare
XSW
BWET
-
Basic Materials
XSW
-
BWET
-
Consumer Defensive
XSW
-
BWET
-
Energy
XSW
-
BWET
-
Real Estate
XSW
-
BWET
-
Utilities
XSW
-
BWET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSW vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
XSW
BWET
XSW vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSW | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.96 | -0.96 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 59.51 | -59.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 158.07 | -158.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSW | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 18.57 | -18.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.90 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
XSW vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSW | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.38% | -56.90% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.75% | -30.64% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.75% | -56.90% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.64% | -11.29% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -24.09% | +14.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.71% | 11.51% | +4.20% |
Volatility
XSW vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is 10.68%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that XSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSW | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 33.96% | -23.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.51% | 88.49% | -64.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.63% | 98.35% | -69.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 70.45% | -41.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 70.45% | -44.20% |
XSW vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSW vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
XSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSW and BWET have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to XSW (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs BWET's -56.90%.
On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 129.64% vs 11.02% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 129.64% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
XSW has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.
XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while BWET is Commodities. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 3.50% for BWET.
BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSW and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer