XSW vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSW returned 8.06%/yr vs 123.86%/yr for BWET. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

XSW vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSW achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 968.33% return.

XSW

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: -13.68%
• 6M: -15.49%
• 1Y: -10.86%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: -1.20%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

BWET

• 1D: -5.48%
• 1M: 18.43%
• YTD: 968.33%
• 6M: 944.72%
• 1Y: 1,424.52%
• 3Y*: 123.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSW vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF	-13.68%	-0.90%	25.81%	32.56%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	968.33%	96.22%	-39.21%	14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between XSW and BWET is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	-0.04

Return for Risk

XSW vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSW

XSW Risk / Return Rank: 6
XSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
XSW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSW vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSW	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	14.65	-15.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	6.07	-6.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.87	-0.91
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	47.03	-47.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	147.28	-147.95

XSW vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 14.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSW and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XSW vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSW	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.38%	-56.90%	+11.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.75%	-30.64%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.75%	-56.81%	+23.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.30%	-5.48%	-15.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.86%	-23.76%	+13.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.31%	11.60%	+4.71%

Volatility

XSW vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is 11.42%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 26.27%. This indicates that XSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSW	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.42%	26.27%	-14.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.81%	89.01%	-65.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.83%	98.57%	-69.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.89%	70.47%	-41.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.26%	70.47%	-44.21%

XSW vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSW vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSW nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF	0.00%	0.06%	0.07%	0.20%	0.09%	0.13%	0.26%	0.12%	0.31%	0.46%	0.87%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSW and BWET in my portfolio?

XSW and BWET have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSW or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (26.27%) compared to XSW (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, XSW or BWET?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 123.86% vs 8.06% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 11.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSW or BWET?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 123.86% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSW or BWET?

XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSW or BWET?

XSW and BWET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XSW and BWET?

XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while BWET is Commodities. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.