PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSVM vs. SEIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSVM vs. SEIM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) and SEIM (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. XSVM is passively managed, while SEIM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSVM returned 17.66%/yr vs 29.06%/yr for SEIM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSVM charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIM.

Performance

XSVM vs. SEIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than SEIM's 18.33% return.

XSVM

1D
0.77%
1M
3.66%
YTD
20.98%
6M
18.82%
1Y
37.12%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
13.32%

SEIM

1D
-2.24%
1M
2.95%
YTD
18.33%
6M
16.44%
1Y
34.90%
3Y*
29.06%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSVM vs. SEIM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF		20.98%7.47%2.30%20.20%-9.70%
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF		18.33%20.20%39.12%16.25%-5.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVM and SEIM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022

0.64

The correlation between XSVM and SEIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSVM vs. SEIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSVM
SEIM

Financial Services

38.7%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

17.4%
7.2%

Technology

9.5%
29.5%

Energy

9.3%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
7.9%

Industrials

6.3%
6.8%

Real Estate

4.8%
7.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
4.4%

Basic Materials

2.0%
4.7%

Utilities

1.2%
2.4%

Healthcare

1.1%
9.5%

Financial Services

XSVM
38.7%
SEIM
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XSVM
17.4%
SEIM
7.2%

Technology

XSVM
9.5%
SEIM
29.5%

Energy

XSVM
9.3%
SEIM
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSVM
6.9%
SEIM
7.9%

Industrials

XSVM
6.3%
SEIM
6.8%

Real Estate

XSVM
4.8%
SEIM
7.2%

Communication Services

XSVM
2.8%
SEIM
4.4%

Basic Materials

XSVM
2.0%
SEIM
4.7%

Utilities

XSVM
1.2%
SEIM
2.4%

Healthcare

XSVM
1.1%
SEIM
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF

SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF

Often compared with XSVM:
XSVM vs. XSMOXSVM vs. AVUVXSVM vs. RWJXSVM vs. XSHQXSVM vs. SPHBXSVM vs. DGRSXSVM vs. RYPRX
Often compared with SEIM:
SEIM vs. SPMOSEIM vs. FDMOSEIM vs. VOOSEIM vs. HFGOSEIM vs. FXAIXSEIM vs. FCNTXSEIM vs. BDGS

Return for Risk

XSVM vs. SEIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
SEIM
SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSVM vs. SEIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XSVMSEIMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.03
2.01

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.93
2.72

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.48

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

14.90

-3.45

XSVM vs. SEIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the SEIM Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVM and SEIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSVM vs. SEIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than SEIM's maximum drawdown of -22.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and SEIM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSVMSEIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.57%

-22.17%

-40.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-10.07%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.21%

-22.17%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-2.24%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-3.97%

-7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.35%

+0.90%

Volatility

XSVM vs. SEIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) is 4.63%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that XSVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSVMSEIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

7.15%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

14.49%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

17.45%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

19.09%

+3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.07%

19.09%

+5.98%

XSVM vs. SEIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSVM vs. SEIM - Dividend Comparison

XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than SEIM's 0.52% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF		0.52%0.56%0.48%0.89%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF		1.82%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSVM and SEIM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEIM has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to XSVM (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs SEIM's -22.17%.

On 3-year performance, SEIM leads with 29.06% vs 17.66% for XSVM. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEIM has performed better with a 29.06% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.52% for SEIM.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.15% for SEIM.

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSVM and SEIM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer