PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSVM vs. SEIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSVM vs. SEIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than SEIM's 18.91% return.


XSVM

1D
-1.47%
1M
1.71%
YTD
16.87%
6M
16.68%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
12.72%

SEIM

1D
-0.33%
1M
7.63%
YTD
18.91%
6M
20.91%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
29.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSVM vs. SEIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
16.87%7.47%2.30%20.20%-6.79%
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
18.91%20.20%39.12%16.25%-2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVM and SEIM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.64

The correlation between XSVM and SEIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSVM vs. SEIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSVM
SEIM

Financial Services

38.8%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

17.0%
7.2%

Energy

9.9%
11.8%

Technology

7.8%
29.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
7.9%

Industrials

6.7%
6.8%

Real Estate

5.0%
7.2%

Communication Services

2.9%
4.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
4.7%

Healthcare

1.4%
9.5%

Utilities

1.3%
2.4%

Financial Services

XSVM
38.8%
SEIM
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XSVM
17.0%
SEIM
7.2%

Energy

XSVM
9.9%
SEIM
11.8%

Technology

XSVM
7.8%
SEIM
29.5%

Consumer Defensive

XSVM
7.3%
SEIM
7.9%

Industrials

XSVM
6.7%
SEIM
6.8%

Real Estate

XSVM
5.0%
SEIM
7.2%

Communication Services

XSVM
2.9%
SEIM
4.4%

Basic Materials

XSVM
1.9%
SEIM
4.7%

Healthcare

XSVM
1.4%
SEIM
9.5%

Utilities

XSVM
1.3%
SEIM
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSVM vs. SEIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIM
SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSVM vs. SEIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSVMSEIMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.68

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

16.18

-5.53

XSVM vs. SEIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SEIM Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVM and SEIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSVMSEIMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.28

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.19

-0.83

Drawdowns

XSVM vs. SEIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than SEIM's maximum drawdown of -22.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and SEIM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSVMSEIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.57%

-22.17%

-40.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-10.07%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.21%

-22.17%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.33%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.57%

-3.98%

-7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

2.29%

+0.98%

Volatility

XSVM vs. SEIM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) at 4.68%. This indicates that XSVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSVMSEIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

4.68%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

13.33%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.59%

16.28%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.71%

18.86%

+3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.09%

18.86%

+6.23%

XSVM vs. SEIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSVM vs. SEIM - Dividend Comparison

XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than SEIM's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
0.52%0.56%0.48%0.89%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.81%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSVM and SEIM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSVM has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to SEIM (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs SEIM's -22.17%.

On 3-year performance, SEIM leads with 29.67% vs 15.99% for XSVM. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEIM has performed better with a 29.67% return vs 15.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.52% for SEIM.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.15% for SEIM.

SEIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSVM and SEIM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer