XSVM vs. PXI
XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) and PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - XSVM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index while PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSVM returned 12.94%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for PXI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSVM charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PXI.
Performance
XSVM vs. PXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly lower than PXI's 29.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XSVM has outperformed PXI with an annualized return of 12.94%, while PXI has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.
XSVM
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 32.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
PXI
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 24.43%
- YTD
- 29.02%
- 1Y
- 33.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.42%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
XSVM vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 23.59% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 3.62% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 29.02% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | -8.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVM and PXI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XSVM and PXI has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XSVM vs. PXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSVM
PXI
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
XSVM
PXI
Consumer Cyclical
XSVM
PXI
-
Real Estate
XSVM
PXI
-
Energy
XSVM
PXI
Industrials
XSVM
PXI
Basic Materials
XSVM
PXI
Technology
XSVM
PXI
-
Utilities
XSVM
PXI
-
Communication Services
XSVM
PXI
-
Consumer Defensive
XSVM
PXI
-
Healthcare
XSVM
PXI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSVM vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank
XSVM
PXI
XSVM vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSVM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.68 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 7.29 | +2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSVM vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, smaller than the maximum PXI drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and PXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.57% | -85.08% | +22.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -12.40% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.21% | -30.74% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | -33.47% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.02% | -79.55% | +30.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -6.01% | +5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -29.32% | +17.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 4.56% | -1.31% |
Volatility
XSVM vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) is 4.40%, while Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that XSVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSVM | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 7.31% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 17.49% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 22.36% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 33.25% | -10.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.00% | 36.99% | -11.99% |
XSVM vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than PXI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSVM vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison
XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than PXI's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.27% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.78% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSVM and PXI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXI has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to XSVM (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs PXI's -85.08%.
On 10-year performance, XSVM leads with 12.94% vs 5.98% for PXI. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.27% for PXI.
XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.60% for PXI.
XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSVM and PXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer