XSVM vs. CALF
XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSVM returned 7.44%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for CALF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSVM charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
XSVM vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 14.10% return.
XSVM
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 42.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
CALF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
XSVM vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 21.88% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 7.60% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.10% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVM and CALF is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XSVM and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSVM vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSVM
CALF
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XSVM
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
XSVM
CALF
Energy
XSVM
CALF
Technology
XSVM
CALF
Consumer Defensive
XSVM
CALF
Industrials
XSVM
CALF
Real Estate
XSVM
CALF
Communication Services
XSVM
CALF
Basic Materials
XSVM
CALF
Healthcare
XSVM
CALF
Utilities
XSVM
CALF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSVM vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
XSVM
CALF
XSVM vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSVM | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 4.77 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | 13.43 | -1.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSVM vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than CALF's maximum drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVM | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.57% | -47.58% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -6.15% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.21% | -34.22% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | -34.22% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.29% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.55% | -10.71% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 2.18% | +1.08% |
Volatility
XSVM vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) have volatilities of 5.09% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSVM | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 4.93% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 10.67% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 15.90% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 23.43% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 25.99% | -0.91% |
XSVM vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSVM vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than CALF's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.20% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSVM and CALF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSVM has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to CALF (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 5-year performance, XSVM leads with 7.44% vs 3.80% for CALF. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 7.44% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.20% for CALF.
XSVM is categorized as Momentum, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.59% for CALF.
XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSVM and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer