PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSPI vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSPI vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XSPI

1D
-0.89%
1M
5.09%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSPI vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XSPI and AMDW is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSPI vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XSPI vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSPIAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

4.83

-3.28

Drawdowns

XSPI vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSPI drawdown since its inception was -11.59%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPI and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSPIAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-34.64%

+23.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

0.00%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-14.66%

+12.43%

Volatility

XSPI vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSPIAMDWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

81.56%

-63.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

81.56%

-63.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

81.56%

-63.92%

XSPI vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSPI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSPI vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

XSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
28.98%34.78%
XSPI
NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF
6.83%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSPI and AMDW have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSPI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSPI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 6.83% for XSPI.

They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XSPI and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSPI and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer