XSPI vs. AMDW
XSPI (NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XSPI is passively managed, while AMDW is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSPI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.
Performance
XSPI vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XSPI
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 12.41%
- YTD
- 175.60%
- 6M
- 173.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSPI vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 3.60% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 134.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPI and AMDW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSPI vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSPI vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPI drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPI and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPI | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -34.64% | +22.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -7.34% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -14.22% | +11.79% |
Volatility
XSPI vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSPI | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 83.24% | -64.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 83.24% | -64.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 83.24% | -64.57% |
XSPI vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSPI vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
XSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, less than AMDW's 37.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 37.19% | 34.78% |
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 7.06% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSPI and AMDW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSPI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSPI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.19%, compared with 7.06% for XSPI.
They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XSPI and 0.99% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for XSPI and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer