PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSPI vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSPI vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XSPI

1D
1.16%
1M
0.67%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QQQI

1D
0.68%
1M
-3.08%
6M
5.69%
YTD
6.90%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$341.25M$334.46M$358.36M
$3.39M$3.19M$3.26M

XSPI vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XSPI and QQQI is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSPI vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSPI vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSPIQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

XSPI vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSPI vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSPI drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPI and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSPIQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-20.00%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-5.92%

+5.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-2.27%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

Volatility

XSPI vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSPIQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.10%

16.35%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

17.75%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

17.75%

+0.35%

XSPI vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSPI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSPI vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

XSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, less than QQQI's 14.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.38%13.82%12.85%
XSPI
NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF
8.35%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSPI and QQQI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XSPI.

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 14.38%, compared with 8.35% for XSPI.

XSPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XSPI and 0.68% for QQQI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSPI and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer