XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L
XSNR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XLBP.L (Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from Xtrackers and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L returned 12.04%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for XLBP.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSNR.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLBP.L.
Performance
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSNR.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than XLBP.L's 12.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L has outperformed XLBP.L with an annualized return of 12.04%, while XLBP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.
XSNR.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 17.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.04%
XLBP.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 7.81% | 20.64% | 5.20% | 21.57% | -14.54% | 21.19% | 12.17% | 27.37% | -12.09% | 21.42% |
XLBP.L Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.87% | 3.47% | 0.77% | 6.09% | -1.67% | 28.80% | 15.99% | 19.70% | -9.97% | 12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSNR.L and XLBP.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XSNR.L and XLBP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
Communication Services
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
-
Financial Services
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
-
Basic Materials
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
Consumer Defensive
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
-
Technology
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
Energy
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
-
Healthcare
XSNR.L
-
XLBP.L
-
Real Estate
XSNR.L
-
XLBP.L
-
Utilities
XSNR.L
-
XLBP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSNR.L
XLBP.L
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSNR.L | XLBP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.86 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.33 | 6.29 | -1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSNR.L | XLBP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.37 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.59 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.56 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSNR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than XLBP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSNR.L and XLBP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSNR.L | XLBP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -28.58% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -10.74% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.10% | -21.98% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | -21.98% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -28.58% | -7.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.35% | -3.23% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -5.53% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 3.18% | +0.87% |
Volatility
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) at 5.17%. This indicates that XSNR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLBP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSNR.L | XLBP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 5.17% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 11.95% | +3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 14.85% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 16.38% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 18.20% | +0.69% |
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSNR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSNR.L nor XLBP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSNR.L and XLBP.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLBP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLBP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSNR.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSNR.L and 0.14% for XLBP.L.
Find the right allocation for XSNR.L and XLBP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer