PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSNR.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than XLBP.L's 12.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L has outperformed XLBP.L with an annualized return of 12.04%, while XLBP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.


XSNR.L

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
7.81%
6M
9.55%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
12.04%

XLBP.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.77%
YTD
12.87%
6M
15.98%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSNR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
7.81%20.64%5.20%21.57%-14.54%21.19%12.17%27.37%-12.09%21.42%
XLBP.L
Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF
12.87%3.47%0.77%6.09%-1.67%28.80%15.99%19.70%-9.97%12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XSNR.L and XLBP.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.64

The correlation between XSNR.L and XLBP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSNR.L
XLBP.L

Industrials

97.5%
1.6%

Communication Services

3.0%

-

Financial Services

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.7%
89.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Technology

0.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
8.6%

Energy

0.3%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

XSNR.L
97.5%
XLBP.L
1.6%

Communication Services

XSNR.L
3.0%
XLBP.L

-

Financial Services

XSNR.L
1.6%
XLBP.L

-

Basic Materials

XSNR.L
0.7%
XLBP.L
89.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSNR.L
0.5%
XLBP.L

-

Technology

XSNR.L
0.5%
XLBP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSNR.L
0.5%
XLBP.L
8.6%

Energy

XSNR.L
0.3%
XLBP.L

-

Healthcare

XSNR.L

-

XLBP.L

-

Real Estate

XSNR.L

-

XLBP.L

-

Utilities

XSNR.L

-

XLBP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSNR.L
XSNR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XLBP.L
XLBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSNR.LXLBP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.86

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

6.29

-1.97

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSNR.L and XLBP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSNR.LXLBP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.35

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.37

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.59

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.56

+0.08

Drawdowns

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSNR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than XLBP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSNR.L and XLBP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSNR.LXLBP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-28.58%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-10.74%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.10%

-21.98%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.20%

-21.98%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-28.58%

-7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-3.23%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-5.53%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

3.18%

+0.87%

Volatility

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) at 5.17%. This indicates that XSNR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLBP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSNR.LXLBP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

5.17%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.20%

11.95%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

14.85%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

16.38%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

18.20%

+0.69%

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSNR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSNR.L vs. XLBP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSNR.L nor XLBP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSNR.L and XLBP.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLBP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLBP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSNR.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSNR.L and 0.14% for XLBP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSNR.L and XLBP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer