XLBP.L vs. SPYL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (SPYL.DE).
XLBP.L and SPYL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLBP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. SPYL.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500®. It was launched on Oct 31, 2023. Both XLBP.L and SPYL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLBP.L or SPYL.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between XLBP.L and SPYL.DE is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XLBP.L vs. SPYL.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XLBP.L:
0.37
SPYL.DE:
2.21
XLBP.L:
0.60
SPYL.DE:
3.06
XLBP.L:
1.07
SPYL.DE:
1.44
XLBP.L:
0.42
SPYL.DE:
3.38
XLBP.L:
1.02
SPYL.DE:
14.72
XLBP.L:
4.47%
SPYL.DE:
1.89%
XLBP.L:
12.28%
SPYL.DE:
12.63%
XLBP.L:
-28.58%
SPYL.DE:
-8.25%
XLBP.L:
-6.46%
SPYL.DE:
-0.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBP.L achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than SPYL.DE's 3.51% return.
XLBP.L
4.84%
-2.87%
0.79%
5.06%
10.34%
9.53%
SPYL.DE
3.51%
0.17%
17.06%
26.38%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLBP.L vs. SPYL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLBP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.DE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLBP.L vs. SPYL.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XLBP.L
SPYL.DE
XLBP.L vs. SPYL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (SPYL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLBP.L vs. SPYL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLBP.L nor SPYL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLBP.L vs. SPYL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than SPYL.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBP.L and SPYL.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLBP.L vs. SPYL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (SPYL.DE) have volatilities of 3.08% and 3.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.