XSNR.L vs. XLIP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L).
XSNR.L and XLIP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSNR.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Jul 3, 2007. XLIP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both XSNR.L and XLIP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XSNR.L vs. XLIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSNR.L vs. XLIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -0.29% | 20.64% | 5.20% | 21.57% | -14.54% | 21.19% | 12.17% | 27.37% | -12.09% | 21.42% |
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 6.91% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 6.12% | 22.08% | 6.17% | 24.82% | -9.41% | 9.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSNR.L achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than XLIP.L's 6.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L has underperformed XLIP.L with an annualized return of 11.43%, while XLIP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.
XSNR.L
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -7.50%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
XLIP.L
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 23.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSNR.L vs. XLIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSNR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XSNR.L vs. XLIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSNR.L
XLIP.L
XSNR.L vs. XLIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSNR.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.37 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.92 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.26 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.41 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 8.40 | -4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSNR.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.37 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.83 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.74 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.75 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSNR.L and XLIP.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XSNR.L vs. XLIP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSNR.L nor XLIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XSNR.L vs. XLIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSNR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, roughly equal to the maximum XLIP.L drawdown of -34.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSNR.L and XLIP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSNR.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -34.56% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -11.51% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | -21.02% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -34.56% | -1.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.96% | -6.45% | -3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -4.44% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 2.69% | +1.15% |
Volatility
XSNR.L vs. XLIP.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) at 5.21%. This indicates that XSNR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSNR.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 5.21% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 9.62% | +3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.00% | 16.74% | +2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 15.86% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 18.28% | +0.40% |