XLBP.L vs. XLIP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L).
XLBP.L and XLIP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLBP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. XLIP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both XLBP.L and XLIP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLBP.L vs. XLIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLBP.L vs. XLIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLBP.L Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF | 11.67% | 3.47% | 0.77% | 6.09% | -1.67% | 28.80% | 15.99% | 19.70% | -9.97% | 12.17% |
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 6.91% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 6.12% | 22.08% | 6.17% | 24.82% | -9.41% | 9.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBP.L achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly higher than XLIP.L's 6.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XLBP.L has underperformed XLIP.L with an annualized return of 11.15%, while XLIP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.
XLBP.L
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
XLIP.L
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 23.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLBP.L vs. XLIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLBP.L and XLIP.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLBP.L vs. XLIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLBP.L
XLIP.L
XLBP.L vs. XLIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLBP.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.37 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.92 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 2.41 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 8.40 | -2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLBP.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.37 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.83 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.74 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.75 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBP.L and XLIP.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XLBP.L vs. XLIP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLBP.L nor XLIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLBP.L vs. XLIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum XLIP.L drawdown of -34.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBP.L and XLIP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBP.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -34.56% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -11.51% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -21.02% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.58% | -34.56% | +5.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.26% | -6.45% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -4.44% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.69% | +0.23% |
Volatility
XLBP.L vs. XLIP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) at 5.21%. This indicates that XLBP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLBP.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 5.21% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 9.62% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 16.74% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 15.86% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 18.28% | -0.09% |