XLBP.L vs. BRIP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L).
XLBP.L and BRIP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLBP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. BRIP.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Mirae Asset European Infrastructure Development Index. It was launched on Sep 3, 2024. Both XLBP.L and BRIP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLBP.L vs. BRIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLBP.L vs. BRIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XLBP.L Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF | 11.67% | 3.47% | -2.24% |
BRIP.L Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating | 8.34% | 33.47% | -3.56% |
Different Trading Currencies
XLBP.L is traded in GBp, while BRIP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BRIP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBP.L achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly higher than BRIP.L's 8.34% return.
XLBP.L
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
BRIP.L
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLBP.L vs. BRIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLBP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BRIP.L's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XLBP.L vs. BRIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLBP.L
BRIP.L
XLBP.L vs. BRIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLBP.L | BRIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.62 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 2.13 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 2.46 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 8.05 | -2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLBP.L | BRIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.62 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.58 | -1.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBP.L and BRIP.L is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XLBP.L vs. BRIP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLBP.L nor BRIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLBP.L vs. BRIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than BRIP.L's maximum drawdown of -10.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBP.L and BRIP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBP.L | BRIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -10.38% | -18.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -10.38% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.26% | -4.25% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -2.32% | -3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.18% | -0.26% |
Volatility
XLBP.L vs. BRIP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L) have volatilities of 6.84% and 6.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLBP.L | BRIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 6.63% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 11.48% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 15.72% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 14.85% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 14.85% | +3.34% |