XSMO vs. YCS
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSMO returned 15.36%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for YCS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
XSMO vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 25.55% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed YCS with an annualized return of 15.36%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.63% annualized return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 25.55%
- 6M
- 21.13%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 25.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
XSMO vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 25.55% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.78% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and YCS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008 | 0.15 |
The correlation between XSMO and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
YCS
XSMO vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSMO | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 3.79 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.23 | 11.86 | +2.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -49.56% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -8.30% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -23.05% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -27.32% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | -27.32% | -12.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.11% | -19.88% | +8.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.65% | -0.02% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 2.22% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.89% | 12.19% | +2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.41% | 16.96% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 21.10% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 18.96% | +5.19% |
XSMO vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMO and YCS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSMO has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.36% vs 13.63% for YCS. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 13.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 1.00% for YCS.
XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer