PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMO vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMO vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 13.85%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.44% annualized return.


XSMO

1D
-0.23%
1M
-4.08%
6M
14.13%
YTD
20.85%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
13.85%
ALL TIME*
9.09%

XMVM

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.11%
6M
13.72%
YTD
17.44%
1Y
38.27%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.44%
ALL TIME*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.16M$2.04M$1.98M
$20.63M$21.90M$21.28M

XSMO vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
20.85%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
17.44%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMO and XMVM is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.79

The correlation between XSMO and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSMO vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMO
XMVM

Industrials

19.8%
11.7%

Technology

17.8%
5.1%

Healthcare

16.9%
2.5%

Financial Services

13.4%
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
14.8%

Basic Materials

6.0%
0.8%

Real Estate

4.6%
4.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
0.9%

Utilities

3.4%
8.5%

Energy

2.7%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
1.2%

Industrials

XSMO
19.8%
XMVM
11.7%

Technology

XSMO
17.8%
XMVM
5.1%

Healthcare

XSMO
16.9%
XMVM
2.5%

Financial Services

XSMO
13.4%
XMVM
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XSMO
9.0%
XMVM
14.8%

Basic Materials

XSMO
6.0%
XMVM
0.8%

Real Estate

XSMO
4.6%
XMVM
4.9%

Communication Services

XSMO
4.0%
XMVM
0.9%

Utilities

XSMO
3.4%
XMVM
8.5%

Energy

XSMO
2.7%
XMVM
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

XSMO
2.5%
XMVM
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMO vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSMO vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSMOXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.91

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

12.52

-3.37

XSMO vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMO and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSMO vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMOXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-62.83%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-9.18%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-24.12%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-24.12%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.39%

-45.07%

+5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

-0.71%

-6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.07%

-10.20%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.86%

+0.25%

Volatility

XSMO vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.29%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMOXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

3.29%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.61%

9.25%

+6.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.92%

14.85%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

21.24%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

22.74%

+1.39%

XSMO vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSMO vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than XMVM's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.79%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.55%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSMO and XMVM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSMO has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to XMVM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 13.85% vs 12.44% for XMVM. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.55% for XSMO.

XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMO and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer