XSMO vs. XLV
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSMO returned 15.17%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for XLV. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
XSMO vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 15.17%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 24.80%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 37.87%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
XSMO vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.80% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and XLV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XSMO and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSMO vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSMO
XLV
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
XSMO
XLV
-
Industrials
XSMO
XLV
-
Healthcare
XSMO
XLV
Financial Services
XSMO
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSMO
XLV
-
Basic Materials
XSMO
XLV
-
Real Estate
XSMO
XLV
-
Communication Services
XSMO
XLV
-
Utilities
XSMO
XLV
-
Energy
XSMO
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
XSMO
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
XLV
XSMO vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSMO | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.17 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 1.38 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 3.31 | +10.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -39.17% | -18.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -10.47% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -17.11% | -7.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -17.11% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | -28.40% | -10.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.59% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -7.12% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.37% | -1.74% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.90%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 4.90% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 10.60% | +4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 15.03% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 14.75% | +7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 16.58% | +7.57% |
XSMO vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than XLV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMO and XLV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSMO has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.17% vs 9.81% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.52% for XSMO.
XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.08% for XLV.
XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer