XSMO vs. XLK
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSMO returned 15.17%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for XLK. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
XSMO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 15.17%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 24.80%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 35.19%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
XSMO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.80% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and XLK is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XSMO and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSMO vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSMO
XLK
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
XSMO
XLK
Industrials
XSMO
XLK
Healthcare
XSMO
XLK
-
Financial Services
XSMO
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSMO
XLK
-
Basic Materials
XSMO
XLK
-
Real Estate
XSMO
XLK
-
Communication Services
XSMO
XLK
-
Utilities
XSMO
XLK
-
Energy
XSMO
XLK
Consumer Defensive
XSMO
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
XLK
XSMO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSMO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 3.36 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 10.85 | +2.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -82.05% | +23.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -15.92% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -25.66% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -33.56% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | -33.56% | -5.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.77% | +6.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -34.93% | +23.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.92% | -2.29% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) is 7.71%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that XSMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 10.86% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 18.92% | -3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 22.55% | -3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 25.18% | -2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 24.64% | -0.49% |
XSMO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMO and XLK have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to XSMO (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.19% vs 15.17% for XSMO. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XSMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 15.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.
XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while XLK is Technology Equities. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer