XSMO vs. WGROX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and WGROX (Wasatch Core Growth Fund) are both funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while WGROX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch. Over the past 10 years, XSMO returned 14.34%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for WGROX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WGROX.

Performance

XSMO vs. WGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 20.54% return, which is significantly higher than WGROX's 1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed WGROX with an annualized return of 14.34%, while WGROX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.

XSMO

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -0.62%
• YTD: 20.54%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 30.63%
• 3Y*: 23.23%
• 5Y*: 10.21%
• 10Y*: 14.34%

WGROX

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 6M: -0.68%
• 1Y: -4.66%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: 0.46%
• 10Y*: 10.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMO vs. WGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF	20.54%	9.80%	17.45%	21.55%	-15.44%	19.24%	21.96%	28.65%	-3.44%	23.95%
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund	1.09%	-10.37%	13.13%	33.43%	-30.86%	20.76%	36.73%	33.31%	-3.75%	24.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMO and WGROX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005	0.86

The correlation between XSMO and WGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XSMO vs. WGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMO

XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 60
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

WGROX

WGROX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
WGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMO vs. WGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSMO	WGROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	-0.22	+1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	-0.18	+2.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.98	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	-0.26	+3.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.75	-0.66	+12.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSMO vs. WGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the WGROX Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMO and WGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSMO	WGROX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	-0.22	+1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.02	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.45	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.55	-0.16

Drawdowns

XSMO vs. WGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum WGROX drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and WGROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSMO	WGROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.06%	-61.61%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-15.89%	+7.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.76%	-27.61%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.62%	-40.16%	+10.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.39%	-40.16%	+0.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-17.99%	+15.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.13%	-9.90%	-1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	6.34%	-3.73%

Volatility

XSMO vs. WGROX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) at 5.59%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSMO	WGROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.73%	5.59%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.49%	14.21%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.01%	19.18%	-0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.68%	23.01%	-0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.14%	23.33%	+0.81%

XSMO vs. WGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than WGROX's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSMO vs. WGROX - Dividend Comparison

XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than WGROX's 8.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund	8.46%	8.55%	9.22%	0.00%	0.71%	16.82%	7.21%	10.73%	10.14%	6.24%	0.15%	12.70%
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF	0.54%	0.75%	0.63%	0.96%	1.19%	0.30%	0.82%	0.69%	0.66%	0.27%	0.30%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSMO and WGROX in my portfolio?

XSMO and WGROX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSMO or WGROX?

XSMO has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to WGROX (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs WGROX's -61.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.