WGROX vs. WAMCX

In the year-to-date period, WGROX achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly lower than WAMCX's 10.81% return. Over the past 10 years, WGROX has outperformed WAMCX with an annualized return of 4.35%, while WAMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.19% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WGROX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMCX's 1.16% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) and Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WGROX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the WAMCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGROX and WAMCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither WGROX nor WAMCX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum WGROX drawdown since its inception was -68.90%, roughly equal to the maximum WAMCX drawdown of -70.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGROX and WAMCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) at 5.80%. This indicates that WGROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.