WGROX vs. VOO
WGROX (Wasatch Core Growth Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - WGROX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, WGROX returned 10.72%/yr vs 15.16%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WGROX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
WGROX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGROX achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, WGROX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.72%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.16% annualized return.
WGROX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 1Y
- -2.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 21.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
WGROX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 4.72% | -10.37% | 13.13% | 33.43% | -30.86% | 20.76% | 36.73% | 33.31% | -3.75% | 24.29% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.45% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGROX and VOO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.83 |
The correlation between WGROX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGROX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
WGROX
VOO
WGROX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WGROX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.31 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 2.43 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 10.60 | -11.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WGROX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGROX drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGROX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGROX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.61% | -33.99% | -27.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.58% | -8.90% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.61% | -18.69% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.16% | -24.52% | -15.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.16% | -33.99% | -6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.05% | -1.11% | -13.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.91% | -3.68% | -6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.31% | 2.04% | +4.27% |
Volatility
WGROX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.16%. This indicates that WGROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGROX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 4.16% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 9.97% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 12.53% | +7.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 16.93% | +6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 18.00% | +5.31% |
WGROX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
WGROX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WGROX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
WGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 8.17% | 8.55% | 9.22% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 16.82% | 7.21% | 10.73% | 10.14% | 6.24% | 0.15% | 12.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WGROX and VOO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGROX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to VOO (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGROX dropped -61.61% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGROX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer