PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMO vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMO vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed UGA with an annualized return of 15.24%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively lower 14.31% annualized return.


XSMO

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.78%
YTD
24.23%
6M
20.02%
1Y
34.26%
3Y*
25.28%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
15.24%

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMO vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
24.23%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMO and UGA is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008

0.24

The correlation between XSMO and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMO vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMO vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSMOUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

3.17

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

9.39

+3.68

XSMO vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMO and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSMO vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMOUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-86.59%

+28.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-18.96%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-26.68%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-38.11%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.39%

-75.89%

+36.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-18.05%

+17.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-36.69%

+25.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

6.43%

-3.80%

Volatility

XSMO vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) is 7.31%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that XSMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMOUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

9.24%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

30.57%

-15.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

35.22%

-15.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.64%

34.45%

-11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

37.22%

-13.09%

XSMO vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSMO vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.53%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSMO and UGA have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to XSMO (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.24% vs 14.31% for UGA. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, XSMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.24% return vs 14.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while UGA is Oil & Gas. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.75% for UGA.

XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMO and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer