PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMO vs. SPGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMO vs. SPGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 20.54% return, which is significantly higher than SPGP's 5.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XSMO having a 14.34% annualized return and SPGP not far ahead at 14.90%.


XSMO

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
20.54%
6M
18.72%
1Y
30.63%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
14.34%

SPGP

1D
0.36%
1M
1.99%
YTD
5.49%
6M
6.49%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
14.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMO vs. SPGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
20.54%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
5.49%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%15.92%39.16%1.68%36.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMO and SPGP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.75

The correlation between XSMO and SPGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSMO vs. SPGP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMO
SPGP

Technology

20.9%
22.8%

Industrials

19.5%
16.8%

Healthcare

13.9%
3.8%

Financial Services

12.3%
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
18.0%

Basic Materials

5.8%

-

Real Estate

5.0%
2.7%

Communication Services

4.1%
6.6%

Utilities

4.0%

-

Energy

3.1%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%

-

Technology

XSMO
20.9%
SPGP
22.8%

Industrials

XSMO
19.5%
SPGP
16.8%

Healthcare

XSMO
13.9%
SPGP
3.8%

Financial Services

XSMO
12.3%
SPGP
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XSMO
9.0%
SPGP
18.0%

Basic Materials

XSMO
5.8%
SPGP

-

Real Estate

XSMO
5.0%
SPGP
2.7%

Communication Services

XSMO
4.1%
SPGP
6.6%

Utilities

XSMO
4.0%
SPGP

-

Energy

XSMO
3.1%
SPGP
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

XSMO
2.4%
SPGP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMO vs. SPGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMO vs. SPGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSMOSPGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.19

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

1.47

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

5.65

+6.11

XSMO vs. SPGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the SPGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMO and SPGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSMOSPGPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.08

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.43

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.71

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.73

-0.35

Drawdowns

XSMO vs. SPGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than SPGP's maximum drawdown of -42.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and SPGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMOSPGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-42.08%

-15.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-11.15%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-22.87%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-22.87%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.39%

-42.08%

+2.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-1.59%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-4.36%

-6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.90%

-0.29%

Volatility

XSMO vs. SPGP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) at 4.04%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMOSPGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

4.04%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.49%

11.76%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

15.23%

+3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.68%

18.54%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.14%

21.21%

+2.93%

XSMO vs. SPGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XSMO and SPGP have an expense ratio of 0.36%.


Dividends

XSMO vs. SPGP - Dividend Comparison

XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SPGP's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
0.88%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.54%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSMO and SPGP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSMO has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to SPGP (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs SPGP's -42.08%.

On 10-year performance, SPGP leads with 14.90% vs 14.34% for XSMO. Both ETFs have the same 0.36% expense ratio. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPGP has performed better with a 14.90% return vs 14.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSMO and SPGP have the same expense ratio: 0.36% per year.

SPGP has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.54% for XSMO.

XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while SPGP is Multi-factor. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index.

XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMO and SPGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer