XSMO vs. QQQM
XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSMO returned 11.48%/yr vs 17.94%/yr for QQQM. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSMO charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
XSMO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 20.73% return.
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 6M
- 21.12%
- 1Y
- 35.59%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 20.73%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 28.64%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- —
XSMO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 23.45% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 9.59% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 20.73% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMO and QQQM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XSMO and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSMO vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSMO
QQQM
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
XSMO
QQQM
Industrials
XSMO
QQQM
Healthcare
XSMO
QQQM
Financial Services
XSMO
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
XSMO
QQQM
Basic Materials
XSMO
QQQM
Real Estate
XSMO
QQQM
Communication Services
XSMO
QQQM
Utilities
XSMO
QQQM
Energy
XSMO
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
XSMO
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
XSMO
QQQM
XSMO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSMO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 3.43 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | 13.15 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSMO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.58 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.81 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.84 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
XSMO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -35.04% | -23.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -11.96% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -22.70% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -35.04% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.75% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.13% | -8.24% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.11% | -0.51% |
Volatility
XSMO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.51%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 4.51% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.15% | 12.06% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 15.91% | +2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 22.23% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 22.11% | +2.01% |
XSMO vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSMO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than QQQM's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSMO has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to QQQM (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 17.94% vs 11.48% for XSMO. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.42% for QQQM.
XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSMO and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer