PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMC.TO vs. MDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSMC.TO is traded in CAD, while MDY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MDY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMC.TO achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than MDY's 15.36% return.


XSMC.TO

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.55%
YTD
16.67%
6M
13.55%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

MDY

1D
0.32%
1M
5.89%
YTD
15.36%
6M
13.71%
1Y
26.61%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
16.67%0.80%17.06%13.24%-10.56%25.12%8.66%3.84%
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
15.36%2.27%23.40%13.52%-7.10%23.41%11.58%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMC.TO and MDY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.80

The correlation between XSMC.TO and MDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMC.TO
MDY

Financial Services

16.4%
13.9%

Industrials

16.1%
25.1%

Technology

16.0%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
10.8%

Healthcare

10.8%
8.7%

Real Estate

7.4%
7.7%

Energy

7.0%
5.6%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.8%

Communication Services

3.2%
1.0%

Utilities

1.8%
3.1%

Financial Services

XSMC.TO
16.4%
MDY
13.9%

Industrials

XSMC.TO
16.1%
MDY
25.1%

Technology

XSMC.TO
16.0%
MDY
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XSMC.TO
12.9%
MDY
10.8%

Healthcare

XSMC.TO
10.8%
MDY
8.7%

Real Estate

XSMC.TO
7.4%
MDY
7.7%

Energy

XSMC.TO
7.0%
MDY
5.6%

Basic Materials

XSMC.TO
4.6%
MDY
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSMC.TO
3.4%
MDY
3.8%

Communication Services

XSMC.TO
3.2%
MDY
1.0%

Utilities

XSMC.TO
1.8%
MDY
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMC.TO vs. MDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMC.TO
XSMC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MDY
MDY Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSMC.TOMDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.75

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

2.54

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

3.28

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.56

12.08

+1.48

XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the MDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMC.TO and MDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSMC.TOMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.75

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.63

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.83

-0.37

Drawdowns

XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMC.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, roughly equal to the maximum MDY drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMC.TO and MDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMC.TOMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-36.83%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-8.15%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.05%

-22.52%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

-22.52%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-4.21%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.21%

+0.20%

Volatility

XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMC.TOMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

4.29%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

11.44%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

15.32%

+2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

17.58%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

19.14%

+4.16%

XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMC.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than MDY's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Dividend Comparison

XSMC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than MDY's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.04%1.15%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
0.99%1.16%1.74%1.00%1.09%1.19%0.78%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSMC.TO and MDY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSMC.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSMC.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.

XSMC.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while MDY is Small Cap Growth Equities. XSMC.TO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XSMC.TO and 0.23% for MDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMC.TO and MDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer