XSMC.TO vs. MDY
XSMC.TO (iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF) and MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSMC.TO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while MDY is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSMC.TO returned 8.32%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for MDY. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSMC.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for MDY.
Performance
XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSMC.TO is traded in CAD, while MDY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MDY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSMC.TO achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than MDY's 15.36% return.
XSMC.TO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 32.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
MDY
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSMC.TO iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF | 16.67% | 0.80% | 17.06% | 13.24% | -10.56% | 25.12% | 8.66% | 3.84% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 15.36% | 2.27% | 23.40% | 13.52% | -7.10% | 23.41% | 11.58% | 3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSMC.TO and MDY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between XSMC.TO and MDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSMC.TO
MDY
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
XSMC.TO
MDY
Industrials
XSMC.TO
MDY
Technology
XSMC.TO
MDY
Consumer Cyclical
XSMC.TO
MDY
Healthcare
XSMC.TO
MDY
Real Estate
XSMC.TO
MDY
Energy
XSMC.TO
MDY
Basic Materials
XSMC.TO
MDY
Consumer Defensive
XSMC.TO
MDY
Communication Services
XSMC.TO
MDY
Utilities
XSMC.TO
MDY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSMC.TO vs. MDY — Risk / Return Rank
XSMC.TO
MDY
XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSMC.TO | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 1.75 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 2.54 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 3.28 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.56 | 12.08 | +1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSMC.TO | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.75 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.63 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.83 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSMC.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, roughly equal to the maximum MDY drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMC.TO and MDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSMC.TO | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.30% | -36.83% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -8.15% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.05% | -22.52% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.05% | -22.52% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -4.21% | -3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.21% | +0.20% |
Volatility
XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSMC.TO | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 4.29% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 11.44% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 15.32% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 17.58% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 19.14% | +4.16% |
XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSMC.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than MDY's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSMC.TO vs. MDY - Dividend Comparison
XSMC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than MDY's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
XSMC.TO iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.19% | 0.78% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSMC.TO and MDY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSMC.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSMC.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
XSMC.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while MDY is Small Cap Growth Equities. XSMC.TO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XSMC.TO and 0.23% for MDY.
Find the right allocation for XSMC.TO and MDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer