PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. VIOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. VIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than VIOO's 15.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XSLV has underperformed VIOO with an annualized return of 5.44%, while VIOO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.


XSLV

1D
-1.47%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.31%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
5.44%

VIOO

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.64%
YTD
15.34%
6M
14.20%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. VIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
6.15%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%22.35%-5.41%8.57%
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
15.34%6.04%8.48%16.16%-16.26%26.79%11.47%22.68%-8.65%13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and VIOO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2013

0.90

The correlation between XSLV and VIOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSLV vs. VIOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSLV
VIOO

Financial Services

37.1%
16.9%

Real Estate

27.5%
7.7%

Utilities

10.6%
2.0%

Industrials

8.3%
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
3.5%

Healthcare

3.7%
11.0%

Technology

3.1%
15.5%

Basic Materials

2.3%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
13.4%

Communication Services

1.1%
3.6%

Energy

0.7%
5.9%

Financial Services

XSLV
37.1%
VIOO
16.9%

Real Estate

XSLV
27.5%
VIOO
7.7%

Utilities

XSLV
10.6%
VIOO
2.0%

Industrials

XSLV
8.3%
VIOO
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

XSLV
4.2%
VIOO
3.5%

Healthcare

XSLV
3.7%
VIOO
11.0%

Technology

XSLV
3.1%
VIOO
15.5%

Basic Materials

XSLV
2.3%
VIOO
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XSLV
1.3%
VIOO
13.4%

Communication Services

XSLV
1.1%
VIOO
3.6%

Energy

XSLV
0.7%
VIOO
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. VIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOO
VIOO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. VIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLVVIOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.31

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.63

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

12.14

-8.34

XSLV vs. VIOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the VIOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and VIOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLVVIOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.82

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.27

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.47

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.57

-0.16

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. VIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, roughly equal to the maximum VIOO drawdown of -44.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and VIOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVVIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-44.15%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-8.77%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-27.93%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-27.93%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

-44.15%

-0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-0.89%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-7.33%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.62%

+0.01%

Volatility

XSLV vs. VIOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) is 3.92%, while Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that XSLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVVIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

4.40%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

11.71%

-2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

17.59%

-4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

21.40%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

22.99%

-3.06%

XSLV vs. VIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSLV vs. VIOO - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than VIOO's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
1.18%1.36%1.48%1.47%1.51%1.16%1.09%1.37%1.32%1.11%1.06%1.26%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.61%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and VIOO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIOO has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to XSLV (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs VIOO's -44.15%.

On 10-year performance, VIOO leads with 10.67% vs 5.44% for XSLV. On fees, VIOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, XSLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIOO has performed better with a 10.67% return vs 5.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XSLV.

XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.18% for VIOO.

XSLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while VIOO is Small Cap Blend Equities. XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while VIOO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.10% for VIOO.

VIOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and VIOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer