PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, XSLV has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 6.00%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.


XSLV

1D
0.37%
1M
1.87%
YTD
10.38%
6M
8.81%
1Y
15.43%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*
6.00%

VBR

1D
0.18%
1M
2.65%
YTD
13.42%
6M
11.41%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
10.38%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%22.35%-5.41%8.57%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
13.42%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and VBR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2013

0.88

The correlation between XSLV and VBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSLV vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSLV
VBR

Financial Services

43.2%
17.5%

Real Estate

28.5%
10.5%

Utilities

9.1%
4.6%

Industrials

7.2%
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.0%

Basic Materials

2.7%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
12.5%

Healthcare

1.5%
8.3%

Communication Services

1.1%
2.8%

Technology

0.9%
12.1%

Energy

0.8%
4.3%

Financial Services

XSLV
43.2%
VBR
17.5%

Real Estate

XSLV
28.5%
VBR
10.5%

Utilities

XSLV
9.1%
VBR
4.6%

Industrials

XSLV
7.2%
VBR
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

XSLV
3.9%
VBR
4.0%

Basic Materials

XSLV
2.7%
VBR
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XSLV
2.3%
VBR
12.5%

Healthcare

XSLV
1.5%
VBR
8.3%

Communication Services

XSLV
1.1%
VBR
2.8%

Technology

XSLV
0.9%
VBR
12.1%

Energy

XSLV
0.8%
VBR
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSLVVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.14

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

11.11

-5.21

XSLV vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-61.98%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-8.85%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-24.19%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-24.19%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

-45.28%

+0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-1.03%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-8.25%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.50%

+0.12%

Volatility

XSLV vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.97%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

3.97%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

10.66%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

15.33%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

19.73%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

21.75%

-1.79%

XSLV vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSLV vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than VBR's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.79%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and VBR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSLV has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 11.02% vs 6.00% for XSLV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 11.02% return vs 6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XSLV.

XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.73% for VBR.

XSLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer