PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XSLV having a 16.90% return and VBR slightly lower at 16.70%. Over the past 10 years, XSLV has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 6.00%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.75% annualized return.


XSLV

1D
0.11%
1M
1.52%
6M
12.18%
YTD
16.90%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*
6.00%
ALL TIME*
8.21%

VBR

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.58%
6M
10.78%
YTD
16.70%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$56.96M$55.85M$67.93M
$818.81K$536.56K$433.11K

XSLV vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
16.90%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%22.35%-5.41%8.57%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
16.70%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and VBR is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2013

0.88

The correlation between XSLV and VBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSLV vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSLV
VBR

Financial Services

43.9%
17.5%

Real Estate

27.4%
11.1%

Utilities

9.2%
4.9%

Industrials

7.2%
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.2%

Basic Materials

2.7%
5.3%

Healthcare

1.7%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
13.6%

Communication Services

1.1%
2.4%

Energy

1.0%
4.3%

Technology

1.0%
10.9%

Financial Services

XSLV
43.9%
VBR
17.5%

Real Estate

XSLV
27.4%
VBR
11.1%

Utilities

XSLV
9.2%
VBR
4.9%

Industrials

XSLV
7.2%
VBR
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSLV
4.5%
VBR
4.2%

Basic Materials

XSLV
2.7%
VBR
5.3%

Healthcare

XSLV
1.7%
VBR
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XSLV
1.5%
VBR
13.6%

Communication Services

XSLV
1.1%
VBR
2.4%

Energy

XSLV
1.0%
VBR
4.3%

Technology

XSLV
1.0%
VBR
10.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSLV vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSLVVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.93

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

10.70

-1.83

XSLV vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-61.98%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-8.85%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-24.19%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-24.19%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

-45.28%

+0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-1.40%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-8.21%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.42%

+0.09%

Volatility

XSLV vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.36%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.36%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

10.22%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

14.90%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

19.56%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

21.66%

-1.73%

XSLV vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSLV vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than VBR's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.77%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.06%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and VBR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSLV has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to VBR (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.75% vs 6.00% for XSLV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.75% return vs 6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XSLV.

XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.77% for VBR.

XSLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer