PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLV vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLV vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLV achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 5.48% return.


XSLV

1D
-1.47%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.31%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
5.44%

QLV

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.14%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.38%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLV vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
6.15%0.31%9.81%1.34%-11.83%29.34%-17.40%7.21%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
5.48%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLV and QLV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.70

The correlation between XSLV and QLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSLV vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSLV
QLV

Financial Services

37.1%
12.3%

Real Estate

27.5%
1.7%

Utilities

10.6%
6.5%

Industrials

8.3%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
8.5%

Healthcare

3.7%
12.7%

Technology

3.1%
28.6%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
6.8%

Communication Services

1.1%
8.4%

Energy

0.7%
5.8%

Financial Services

XSLV
37.1%
QLV
12.3%

Real Estate

XSLV
27.5%
QLV
1.7%

Utilities

XSLV
10.6%
QLV
6.5%

Industrials

XSLV
8.3%
QLV
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSLV
4.2%
QLV
8.5%

Healthcare

XSLV
3.7%
QLV
12.7%

Technology

XSLV
3.1%
QLV
28.6%

Basic Materials

XSLV
2.3%
QLV
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XSLV
1.3%
QLV
6.8%

Communication Services

XSLV
1.1%
QLV
8.4%

Energy

XSLV
0.7%
QLV
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLV vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLV
XSLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLV vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLVQLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.32

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.28

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

9.69

-5.89

XSLV vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLV and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLVQLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.85

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.85

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.69

-0.28

Drawdowns

XSLV vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLV drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than QLV's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLV and QLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLVQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-33.71%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-6.19%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.35%

-12.05%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-17.93%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-0.81%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-4.00%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.45%

+1.18%

Volatility

XSLV vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF (XSLV) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 1.61%. This indicates that XSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLVQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

1.61%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

5.34%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

7.65%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

12.64%

+4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

16.57%

+3.36%

XSLV vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSLV vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

XSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than QLV's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.52%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Low Volatility ETF
2.61%2.14%2.55%2.35%2.78%1.05%2.49%2.43%2.75%1.87%1.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLV and QLV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSLV has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to QLV (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLV dropped -44.34% vs QLV's -33.71%.

On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.73% vs 2.94% for XSLV. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 2.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XSLV.

XSLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.

XSLV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSLV and 0.22% for QLV.

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLV and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer