QLV vs. DEUS
QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and DEUS (Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index, while DEUS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLV returned 10.73%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for DEUS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLV charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DEUS.
Performance
QLV vs. DEUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than DEUS's 11.11% return.
QLV
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DEUS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 18.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
QLV vs. DEUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 5.48% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 6.24% |
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 11.11% | 10.41% | 14.33% | 14.73% | -11.18% | 26.31% | 8.81% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLV and DEUS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between QLV and DEUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
QLV vs. DEUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLV
DEUS
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QLV
DEUS
Healthcare
QLV
DEUS
Financial Services
QLV
DEUS
Consumer Defensive
QLV
DEUS
Communication Services
QLV
DEUS
Consumer Cyclical
QLV
DEUS
Utilities
QLV
DEUS
Industrials
QLV
DEUS
Energy
QLV
DEUS
Basic Materials
QLV
DEUS
Real Estate
QLV
DEUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLV vs. DEUS — Risk / Return Rank
QLV
DEUS
QLV vs. DEUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLV | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.70 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.51 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.74 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 10.39 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLV | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.70 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.61 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.64 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
QLV vs. DEUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum DEUS drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and DEUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLV | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -40.47% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -6.83% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -16.69% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -20.89% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | 0.00% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -4.34% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 1.80% | -0.35% |
Volatility
QLV vs. DEUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) is 1.61%, while Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that QLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLV | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 2.79% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.34% | 8.13% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.65% | 11.02% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.64% | 15.55% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 17.98% | -1.41% |
QLV vs. DEUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DEUS's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QLV vs. DEUS - Dividend Comparison
QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than DEUS's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.14% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 2.75% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLV and DEUS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEUS has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to QLV (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLV dropped -33.71% vs DEUS's -40.47%.
On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.73% vs 9.39% for DEUS. On fees, DEUS is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEUS is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for QLV.
QLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.45% for DEUS.
QLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while DEUS is Mid Cap Blend Equities. QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index, while DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for QLV and 0.17% for DEUS.
QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLV and DEUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer