XSHQ vs. QDEF
XSHQ (Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF) and QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - XSHQ tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index while QDEF tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSHQ returned 7.26%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for QDEF. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XSHQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDEF.
Performance
XSHQ vs. QDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSHQ achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly higher than QDEF's 10.48% return.
XSHQ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 20.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.92%
QDEF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $546.87K | $522.47K | $732.31K | |
| $7.28M | $3.86M | $2.26M |
XSHQ vs. QDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 14.76% | 0.89% | 7.49% | 23.88% | -15.01% | 23.99% | 11.81% | 17.37% | -6.11% | 7.18% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 10.48% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 3.15% | 24.90% | -4.10% | 10.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSHQ and QDEF is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between XSHQ and QDEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSHQ vs. QDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSHQ
QDEF
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XSHQ
QDEF
Technology
XSHQ
QDEF
Industrials
XSHQ
QDEF
Consumer Cyclical
XSHQ
QDEF
Healthcare
XSHQ
QDEF
Energy
XSHQ
QDEF
Communication Services
XSHQ
QDEF
Basic Materials
XSHQ
QDEF
Consumer Defensive
XSHQ
QDEF
Real Estate
XSHQ
QDEF
Utilities
XSHQ
-
QDEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSHQ vs. QDEF — Risk / Return Rank
XSHQ
QDEF
XSHQ vs. QDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSHQ | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.93 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | 12.20 | -7.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSHQ vs. QDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSHQ drawdown since its inception was -38.33%, which is greater than QDEF's maximum drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHQ and QDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSHQ | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.33% | -35.74% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.27% | -6.95% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.34% | -14.43% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -21.37% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.58% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -3.27% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 1.67% | +2.06% |
Volatility
XSHQ vs. QDEF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) at 2.29%. This indicates that XSHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSHQ | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 2.29% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 7.47% | +4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.30% | 9.85% | +7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 13.77% | +7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 16.14% | +6.86% |
XSHQ vs. QDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QDEF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSHQ vs. QDEF - Dividend Comparison
XSHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than QDEF's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.58% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 1.18% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.15% | 2.02% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.11% | 1.16% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSHQ and QDEF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSHQ has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHQ dropped -38.33% vs QDEF's -35.74%.
On 5-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.34% vs 7.26% for XSHQ. On fees, XSHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.18% for XSHQ.
XSHQ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index, while QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSHQ and 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSHQ and QDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer