XSHD vs. SLYV
XSHD (Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSHD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSHD returned -2.42%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for SLYV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSHD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.
Performance
XSHD vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSHD achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 21.58% return.
XSHD
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- YTD
- 16.35%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -2.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.13%
SLYV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- YTD
- 21.58%
- 1Y
- 36.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
XSHD vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHD Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 16.35% | -6.41% | -5.25% | 3.00% | -19.48% | 18.31% | -13.55% | 17.91% | -7.86% | 1.52% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 21.58% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSHD and SLYV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between XSHD and SLYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSHD vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSHD
SLYV
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
-
Real Estate
XSHD
SLYV
Industrials
XSHD
SLYV
Utilities
XSHD
SLYV
Consumer Defensive
XSHD
SLYV
Energy
XSHD
SLYV
Basic Materials
XSHD
SLYV
Consumer Cyclical
XSHD
SLYV
Communication Services
XSHD
SLYV
Healthcare
XSHD
SLYV
Financial Services
XSHD
SLYV
Technology
XSHD
-
SLYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSHD vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
XSHD
SLYV
XSHD vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSHD | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.35 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 3.89 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 12.97 | -9.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSHD vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSHD drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHD and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSHD | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.53% | -61.15% | +11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -9.36% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -28.68% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.67% | -28.68% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.97% | -0.54% | -18.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -8.90% | -7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 2.81% | +1.05% |
Volatility
XSHD vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 3.58%. This indicates that XSHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSHD | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 3.58% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 11.61% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 17.87% | -2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 21.73% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 23.90% | -1.73% |
XSHD vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSHD vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
XSHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than SLYV's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.80% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
XSHD Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.82% | 6.45% | 7.25% | 7.62% | 6.77% | 3.86% | 5.55% | 4.88% | 5.49% | 4.11% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSHD and SLYV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSHD has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to SLYV (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHD dropped -49.53% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
On 5-year performance, SLYV leads with 8.65% vs -2.42% for XSHD. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 8.65% return vs -2.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XSHD.
XSHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 1.80% for SLYV.
XSHD is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. XSHD tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XSHD and 0.15% for SLYV.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSHD and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer